Category: Politics

The Oregonian published a self-centered article by writer (and — of all things — journalism student) Becky Ohlsen on Sunday, another installment in their long-running series of opinion pieces hewing to the conservative line that Portland is a homogeneous bastion of elitist liberals.

A few letters in response appeared in today’s paper, including one by me, although it was somewhat truncated (material they cut appears in bold below, editorial additions appear in italics).

Every couple of years, the Oregonian runs a column like Becky Ohlsen’s on Sunday, making the claim that “With few exceptions, Portlanders inhabit perfect liberal values.”

Perhaps that was the case for Ohlsen when she lived in Portland. I guess it’s taken a trip to beyond her bubble here to realize that there are people of different stripes in the world. But really, she could have managed the same feat at home if she’d been paying attention.

Becky Ohlsen’s opinion piece reiterates a stereotypical view of Portland that every large city — including her current vantage point of New York City — receives from self-appointed moralists promoting The Big City as a cesspool of sex, drugs, and liberalism. The problem is, in NYC or Portland, [But] you don’t have to go any further than, say, the letters and opinion page of The Oregonian to find people espousing views diametrically opposed to the Prius-driving, arugula-eating, hipsters Ohlsen seems to have surrounded herself with here.

Ohlsen says “This is not a call for Portlanders to start roaring down their bike-laned city streets in SUVs.” Is that a serious claim? Has she somehow missed SUVs and trucks on the streets of Portland in her time here? Is she truly unaware that not everyone working in the center of the city, riding MAX from Gresham or driving in from Lake Oswego might not fit her pigeonholes on politics, religion, or other topics? Does she know that The Oregonian publishes Dave Reinhard? She seriously thinks Portlanders don’t argue?

Apart from fixing the question mark after “topics,” I’m not sure that the edits improved the text here.

#35 – Pot Heads

Not many people remember that Richard Nixon preempted network television on November 7th, 1972 for a full day marathon of “Mr. Ed.”

It was a brilliant strategy, because just as polls were closing, they aired “Ed the Witness.” SPOILER ALERT…In “Ed the Witness,” Wilbur ends up in Mexican jail after refusing to pay a repair bill to a mechanic who damaged his trailer. Mr. Ed has to gallop across the border to come to the rescue….

Wait, what were we talking about?

Oh, right.

What Pot Head hasn’t dreamed of being sprung from Mexican jail by a talking horse? Anyway, Nixon’s people knew this, and used it to defeat George McGovern in a landslide.

To this day, George McGovern asserts that he lost the Election due to the striking resemblance between Wilbur and Thomas Eagleton.

From today’s analysis of the presidential race at electoral-vote.com, in a discussion about the eventual winner picking a Senator of the other party for the Cabinet in order to put their seat back in play:

One factor that both candidates will no doubt consider when looking for cabinet members is the possibility of flipping a Senate seat. This will will especially crucial if the Democrats end up with 58 or 59 Senate seats. For Obama, there are three potential choices that will give the Democrats an extra Senate seat: Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME), Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA), and Sen. Judd Gregg (R-NH). All three states have Democratic governors (technically, Gov. John Lynch (D-NH) is up for reelection, but his victory is about as certain as anything in politics can be). In addition, three Republican senators from states with Democratic governors are up for reelection: Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) and Sen. John Sununu (R-NH). Any of these who win are also candidates for the cabinet since their governors are Democrats. For Obama, picking one of them would be a twofer: showing his willingness to work with Republicans while flipping a Senate seat. Needless to say, he would emphasize the first point while really being entirely focused on the second one. Snowe and Specter are long-time respected senators and there would be little carping about their appointment to the cabinet. If Obama were to choose Sen. Gordon Smith (R-OR), there would be a special election immediately to fill the vacancy.

At an increasing pace after the end of the Second World War, the US has sold arms and munitions to countries around the world. Everything from bullets to landmines to tanks to jet fighters to missiles. It’s a time-honored tradition for countries with weapons technology to directly or indirectly supporty the sales of that technology as a ready source of cash (see Krupp). There’s always a market for a more efficient way to kill the enemy.

The US is far from alone in the market, of course. For the entirety of the Cold War, the Soviet Union was a major exporter of weapons, with China following up, even making knock-offs of the famous AK-47 rifle of Soviet design. Everyone with the production capacity got into the game. An enormous amount of the “foreign aid” the US has handed out over the past decades has been paid back into the hands of private American arms manufacturers.

There were a few things that had to be done sub rosa, however. Cluster bombs and land mines, well, their sales were perfectly acceptable to the US government, because we did out best to torpedo any treaties or resolutions banning their sale or use. Technology for nuclear weapons, however, was another matter. That’s something that’s just not talked about, because the US was nominally on board with the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NNPT). It’s been an open secret for a long time that Israel has nuclear weapons, but they don’t talk about it, and we don’t ask about it, in a sort of radioactive version of the military policy on homosexuality.

When the wrong people are involved, though, and it gets out in the open, as it did with Pakistan and A.Q. Khan a few years back, people got the heebie-jeebies. Pakistan saw an opportunity to make some much-needed money from Libya and Iran, as well as gaining missile technology from North Korea. Each of those countries, in turn, could get standard armaments from other sources, but weren’t on the approved list for nukes. A win-win situation all around for them.

At the time, of course, the Bush administration was incensed (at least, as incensed as they got with good buddy Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf). Now, though, we’ve got the opportunity to make a few bucks of our own from nukes — and as you may have heard, there a sort of money crisis going on — so the House and Senate have agreed to sell nuclear fuel, technology, and reactors to Pakistan’s friendly neighbor India, a country that (like Pakistan) hasn’t agreed to the NNPT.

In exchange, India agreed to open up 14 civilian nuclear facilities to international inspection, but would continue to shield eight military reactors from outside scrutiny.

…

Senator Byron Dorgan, Democrat of North Dakota, called the deal a “grievous mistake” that would reward rogue behavior. “We have said to India with this agreement: ‘You can misuse American nuclear technology and secretly develop nuclear weapons.’ That’s what they did. ‘You can test these weapons.’ That’s what they did,” Mr. Dorgan said.

He added: “And after testing, 10 years later, all will be forgiven.”

Mr. Dorgan and Senator Jeff Bingaman, Democrat of New Mexico, tried to amend the agreement to explicitly require the United States to cut off nuclear trade if India conducted a new nuclear test. The agreement’s backers defeated the proposal, arguing that it was unnecessary and that nuclear trade would be halted in such a situation.

Sen. Ron Wyden voted for this stinker, which passed 86-13-1 in the Senate (Sen. Gordon Smith supported it, as well). Representatives Darlene Hooley, David Wu, Earl Blumenauer, and Peter DeFazio all opposed its passage in the House (298-117).

In the wake of the vice-presidential debate with Gov. Sarah Palin, via BoRev.net, some humor for a Friday morning from an actual woman president:

Chilean President Michelle Bachelet wrapped up her trip in the United States last Friday but didn’t leave until getting the last laugh. “Why has there never been a coup in the United States?” joked Bachelet to a group of prominent U.S. investors. “Because there is no U.S. embassy in the United States.”

I wish I’d been recording this, but just about 8PM I was watching CSPAN2 and the camera was on Obama advisor Susan Rice who was was being interviewed in the spin room after the vice-presidential debate. Standing in the background was a thin, bespectacled, serious-looking guy who looked pretty familiar. Then as the interview was wrapping up, he squatted down out of camera sight and up popped “The Daily Show” correspondent John Oliver, who asked her “Where were the gaffes?” After a brief back-and-forth, she apologized for the lack of gaffes on the part of Democratic vice-presidential candidate Sen. Joe Biden, and Oliver left.

In honor of Sen. Joe Biden’s “debate” tonight with Gov. Sarah Palin:

I think Cardozo could probably pilot a plane, because he has experience flying!

Former Sen. George McGovern, the guest for the “Not My Job” segment of this week’s “Wait, Wait, Don’t Tell Me!”

The title of this ad was “Change”:

From Marc Maron — the only reason I ever listened to Air America — and Sam Seder, whose new Maron v Seder project goes live 1 October: